How Many Tias Can A Person Have

Corrado Malanga ... between aliens and demons and face mask

In this article I would not so much discuss the existence (or nonexistence) of the aliens, also because this is already being done in thousands of sites, blogs and forums. But I say that the various stories about aliens just convince me, especially seeing what goes around ... in addition to the great economic affairs (which is relatively dangerous) there are many sects, religions and pseudo pseudo doctrines that have been created around this question. There is thus a large number of false messiahs ready to "donate" their revelations about aliens for "the good of humanity."

However, when it is not "revelations", but data in the form of research, what could be more interesting, and this is the case of theories Corrado Malanga. One of the things

I think Malanga got it in his work is the title of the book, Aliens or Demons . Malanga argues that those who today are called "aliens" were once called demons, and then the two names are perfectly equivalent.

is an argument that can have its own logic: that beings in a traditional culture were seen as entities "demonic", today - in the era of high technology - are seen as "aliens" coming from somewhere What planet. You should not even surprise then if these aliens / demons were able to interact on a physical level: even the works of the Fathers of the Church - and in general of the clergy - speak of these "air entities" that are able to insiadiare men in many ways. S. Augustine said that the demons are able to " build, move, move and turn, so invisible, many objects visible .
(St. Augustine, De Divination daemonum )

This intuition is, however, been accompanied by a research methodology that is based (almost exclusively) on the use of hypnosis and hypnotic regression . Malanga argues that in a state of hypnosis appropriately induced, a person can remember in detail events that occurred many years earlier, without inventing anything, and without lying. Also according to Malanga, during these sessions of hypnosis, in addition to the memory of the encounter with these entities, there is also the deepest part of the person, whom he identified with the Soul. With this you could "talk" and could "interrobare" for important information, the data recovered in this way does not concern only the "question of the aliens, but also the formation of the universe, the past history of mankind .. . and maybe even the future. And it is from these data that Malanga has formed his theories, which now claim to explain an incredible number of issues which are outside the "alien problem", ranging from the origin of humanity and religion, quantum physics at the Hebrew Kabbalah.

Malanga argues further that, during hypnosis, the hypnotist can speak with other beings - which he defined as "parasites" - that would take control of the person, just as happens in cases of demonic possession. Now the question is how one can always differentiate a "parasitic" (ie a daemon), who speaks through the person in hypnosis, and the same person. The researcher says in this regard have prepared the "Control questions" to ask the person in trance, according to the responses you should find out if you're actually conversing with the person (or ... his "soul"), or if you are talking to a " parasite. "

This is precisely what Corado says Malanga. But I honestly do not think so that through hypnosis you can "talk" with the soul or even the spirit here ... Malanga must have confused the 'unconscious' (hence the sub-rational) to something higher; must have confused that the scope psychic (and pergiunta, the lower aspects of the latter) with the spiritual .

Malanga I also think that sin has a bit 'of naivete, believing that these "demons" always behave the same way, and do not find a way to cheat. It is possible that all this time did not understand what you should answer the questions to masquerade as "a person's soul"? Malanga Perhaps - as a good scientist - ignores the sacred texts, and does not know that the devil is "the smartest all the best and

" (Gen 3:1) and that he is " liar and the father of lies" (Jn 8:44). Yet, since he himself admits to have anything to do with qusti beings "ocscuri" should at least have information to know what is being said in this regard from various traditions.

My suspicion is that it is therefore fooled by these entities , and consequently most of his theories are at least of doubtful provenance. We must also consider Malanga says that everything derives from the sessions of hypnosis, which is to "get off" the subject of consciousness were stunned, to "explore" the intricacies of the subconscious and unconscious. This "deep down" (o.. In underworld) is literally part of the techniques used by Malanga, since the person, during a session, it must "see" itself as it descends into the bowels of the earth with an elevator.

In these obscure psychic gutter "that emerge under hypnosis, can really be all there is the risk that the person is pesanteme nte affected by what may be termed" errant influences. " After all the "procedures" of Malanga not seem very different from those of a "medium" or from those used by Theosophists as a channel to the other (demonic) doctrines, with the only difference that induces these Malanga states of consciousness in others. - It may be interesting to see how this research is not entirely ignore the theories of satanic Theosophists, as the positively-and-quotes in his book (A lien or Demons, p.. 154) that the various conferences. -

Now as the source of the theories is at least obscure, it is natural that they are also the theories themselves. In fact, if we look, we see that these theories have all the appearance of being one of the claims of Gnosticism with " scientific " : between what he says Malanga and Gnosticism, there are too many similarities, because it is not suspected.

Just to name a few:

1) According to Gnosticism, religions were created by demons (called rulers), while Malanga argues that they were created by demons / aliens decoy:

" The study of the record of hypnosis would appear that the Being of Light [a demon /" alien parasite ", ed] is the inventor of religions " ( Aliens or Demons, p.. 49)

And again

" The Soul, however, was determined to differentiate itself from the Beings of Light, by defining them
" shadows "and" those who, to subdue man invented religion and the guilt "" ( Aliens or Demons, p.. 236)

In his article (on Genesis) you can read chiaramentre :

"Gods do not exist, but are our manipulators" ( Genesis [article] p.36)

Malanga argues that those who today is enough "spiritually evolved" (???) hates all religions, and especially the Catholic:

"In General males and females evolved adducts, which, fortunately, seem to the majority, are totally atheists and hate the Catholic religion, but do not know why . ( Aliens or Demons, p. 67. )

2) Gnosticism (as well as the Cathar heresy) argues that the human body was created by devil, Malanga argues, in a very similar, that it was created by aliens who would be evil (at least against humanity).

"The aliens would change the structure of the Neanderthal to create a CHRO Magnon. Edattendono soul that we end up inside. " (Genesis [article] , page. 5)

3) In Gnosticism the human body was created as a "trap" for the human soul, the same is the opinion Malang.

"Build a man (us). not an ordinary man but a man with a DNA can be traps for souls . ( Genesis [article], p. 5).

4) Both Gnosticism Malanga who argue that few human beings have a 'soul

"... the adducts [who claims to have encounters with aliens, ed] itself have this presence [the soul] , while many other human beings do not have them "(Aliens or Demons , p. 35)

5) sos Gnosticism holds that the moral, social and religious come from demons (rulers) in the same way Malanga says that it comes from evil aliens who (like the arches of you Gnosticism) dominate the world forever.

6) According to Gnosticism the archons prevent man to join in what is considered the "true god" Malanga argues that the aliens attempt to prevent the man to "evolve" and "awareness"

7) Especially according to the neo -Gnostic (Theosophical), man is in "evolution" and sooner or later he will live in a "new era" (new age) where it will be free from religion. Similarly Malanga argues that sooner or later the man is freed from alien deceivers and religions (they create) ... according to Malanga that happens, it happens in the vicinity of 2012.

8) In Gnosticism and various forms of neo-gnosticism, the man is treated like a god. Malanga of the same opinion is that, at the beginning of his book, says:

" begin to talk about aliens and end up talking about God, that Man " ( Aliens or Demons , p. 17)..

These and other similarities suggest that they Malanga has to do with entities that did not suggest anything positive, but he is mistaken to speak "with the soul of the hypnotist", "with his spirit "and the like. Add to this the fact that the practice of esericizi Malanga proposes pseudo-spiritual, with which you can "get rid of the aliens" and "develop their own conscience" (!!), it takes in my opinion even more disturbing traits. I think it's a person in good faith and that's totally lacking certain knowledge "traditional" because they can understand what is really doing. This does not change the fact that in his work there is something very dark and risks with his work too seriously, encouraging the forces of dissolution.