According to the historical vision that is now commonly accepted, the Middle Ages was a dark and dominated by ignorance. This concept is rooted in our society, and the term "Middle Ages" has been designed with a negative, if not highly derogatory. This " middle age" is seen as an era quite dark, almost an "error of course" (which lasted over a millennium!), Located between two ages "positive": the greek-roman period el ' "modern age". This view, however, is that tutt'alto shiny, and takes into account only the material aspects, economic or technological. " Even when it examines the cultural aspects, we focus especially on those "outsiders", ignoring what has mostly to do with the Holy ... but then a different attitude demeaning the much beloved "goddess of reason."
There is in fact another vision of the Middle Ages, just as distorted, it is newer and is only apparently opposite to the first. Is to always think this time as "irrational", but in a way that you would like positive result is a medieval, populated by wizards and goblins, witches flying on broomsticks and castles haunted by ghosts. A concept, derived mostly from the "romance", which is quite grotesque, and that obviously has a few claims of "historicity" - but unfortunately that is equally present in the collective imagination.
The belief that the Middle Ages was a "dark" period derives from the ideas of ' humanism and of' enlightenment .
Both of these "schools of thought" helping break down the traditional world, which was based on higher principles . Indeed, it was through them that the design theocentric medieval was acting with an anthropocentric conception , and always thanks to them the true dogma-inspired by the divine principles-were replaced with other dogmas. However, they were "human dogma, or rather false dogmas, such as" democracy "or" secularism ", which from then on would become incontestable.
Both of these "schools of thought" helping break down the traditional world, which was based on higher principles . Indeed, it was through them that the design theocentric medieval was acting with an anthropocentric conception , and always thanks to them the true dogma-inspired by the divine principles-were replaced with other dogmas. However, they were "human dogma, or rather false dogmas, such as" democracy "or" secularism ", which from then on would become incontestable.
The "old" way of thinking, then, was accused of "restrictive" for the man or the "goddess of reason." Also As you move away from the Middle Ages-and in time, that the mentality-rather than perceiving this as a limitation, you sing praises to "progress" e. .. to the 'evolution'.
In this way, today's "modern" feel they can look down from their predecessors (and had a "medieval mentality").
should also be noted that (usually) be in contempt, of the Middle Ages, just as there was positive, such as the structure of society.
That was in fact a medieval society that is truly based on religion and thereby creating a concept "sacred" than almost any action-even the "daily life", but also derived a certain "order", intrinsic to the community. Each had its role, both within the family, which total in the company. The latter was organized in certain classes ( oratores , bellatores , laboratores ) and there was hardly room for "revolutionary ideas", or "movements" that touted the destruction of that order. Above all, However, it must be remembered as a man of the Middle Ages could not be questioned religion, which was really a milestone, unshakable and society. The "relativism", so dear to some of our contemporaries, and that is perhaps another "false doctrine"-modern, it was quite unthinkable, just as it was unthinkable that someone could create "religions do it yourself" or something like that should arise the "environmental religion" which are becoming popular today. And I think that it was not so much "for fear of the Inquisition," but actually because certain values, certain principles, were rightly regarded as absolute.
The Middle Ages were therefore anything but a dark period or dominated by ignorance. If the prevailing opinion today says the opposite, this depends only on the poorly understood; bad understanding of a society that in some ways was far superior to ours.
0 comments:
Post a Comment